Expert opinion

CBILS and the personal guarantee

Jim Shaw is Founder and CEO of Shaw & Co. In this article Jim discusses the implications of banks requiring Personal Guarantees (PGs) to lend under the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and the moral rights and wrongs of business owners putting personal assets on the line to support the economy.

5 minutes
March 27, 2020
Words:
Jim Shaw
Images:
Lexscope on Unsplash
PDF:
Report

“Will I have to give a personal guarantee to access CBILS support?"

This is the most common question that clients have been asking us since the Coronavirus Business Interruption Scheme (CBILS) was announced on 11 March 2020.

We have always feared that personal guarantees will be a feature of this emergency funding and said as much in our open letter to the Chancellor published on 19 March 2020. Since details of the scheme were released by the British Business Bank at the beginning of this week, it quickly became clear that most lenders wouldn’t even consider a CBILS facility without a personal guarantee.

Several lenders have since relented for loans under £250,000 but above this amount personal guarantees still appear to be on the table. We also suspect whilst the lenders are reporting to the press, that they are not taking personal guarantees at this lower level, they will take a short form guarantee which will look very similar to a personal guarantee for many business owners.

The one notable exception is RBS who it has been reported will offer business interruption loans without asking business owners for a personal guarantee. We wait to see if this above £250,000 and unilaterally applied, or just in “certain cases”.

To remain balanced, the British Business Bank has restricted lenders from taking security over Primary Residential Property under the scheme. But all other personal assets a business owner holds appear to be fair game.

Focus the mind

In normal times, personal guarantees aren’t about covering expected losses, but they are there to “focus the mind” of the business owner and give the lender comfort that there are personal ramifications for unscrupulous behaviour. As such they are normally limited in quantum and appropriately “sized” given other security offered to the lender.

When business activity is relatively predicable and personal guarantees can be negotiated to be reasonable in quantum and scope, many of our clients have proceeded to enter into such arrangements as a sensible part of an overall funding package.

As such, we are not saying that personal guarantees are flat out inappropriate, far from it, however with the highly uncertain situation we face today, we raise a moral objection when business owners are forced to put personal assets on the line to save their business and access “government support”.

Let’s be clear here, the devastation of the economy has come about through actions of the Government in face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those actions may be the correct ones, and the only ones in light of the scientific advice, but the second order effects of these actions are huge, and no single business owner has a choice about them. This is a state-controlled situation the likes of which this country has never seen before.

“Unprecedented state intervention”

Prime Minister Boris Johnson acknowledged in his daily briefing the “unprecedented state intervention”, and along with his ministers has vowed to “do whatever it takes” to support business and the economy. Unfortunately, the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme falls short of this standard in many ways, not all of which are covered here.

Most notable of these failings from the business owners’ point of view is the insistence on personal guarantees that result in a doubling down of risk and an ultimate underwrite of much of the financial devastation being inflicted on SMEs.

It is easy in these situations to blame unreasonable lenders; however, our view is that the issues start further upstream. The Government must accept that the national balance sheet needs to be used to underpin the economy, wholly and unreservedly. Guarantees need to cover 95%-100% of the loan and personal guarantees prohibited or very limited. In our view, the CBILS arrangements currently seek to push too much of the risk on to the lender and then on to the business owner.

As the CBILS machine is now in full flight, we expect any changes in policy from here will involve tweaks rather than wholesale changes and we expect that personal guarantees will form part of most, if not all loans over £250,000 despite any moral objections.

Skin in the game

Seeing this from the point of view of the Government and the lender you can understand that some “skin in the game” from the business owner is always going to seem fair to them as a protection against the dishonest few.

The key is going to be negotiating the appropriate limits to guarantees, restrictions to specific bank exposures, joint and several liabilities and other deeds of contribution between those directors and shareholders entering them. Not to mention making sure that you are drawing down enough funding to make sure that it’s unlikely you will run out of cash.

We are working with lenders, the British Business Bank and the Government (where we can get access) to improve the CBILS programme. We don’t think that it is going away, we think CBILS is going to be the only game in town for SMEs looking for Government supported cash to prop up their businesses, but we can clearly see that certain changes need to be made before money can really start to flow.

If you want help with your CBILS application and negotiating the right levels of borrowing, terms and security package, do get in touch. Our team is here to help.

Words:
Jim Shaw
 - 
Founder & CEO
Read 
Jim Shaw
's bio

Fundamentals is the UK’s market leading manufacturer of voltage control solutions. Find out why they came to us to help secure a CBILS loan to enhance its product offering.

Read case study

Sector Content

See all Shaw Reports
The Shaw Report - Food & Drink Annual Review July 2022

Shaw Report

|

July 22, 2022

The Shaw Report - Leisure, Tourism & Sport Interim Review July 2022

Shaw Report

|

July 19, 2022

The Shaw Report - Energy & Natural Resources Interim Review June 2022

Shaw Report

|

June 27, 2022

Shaw & Co launches annual analysis of wholesale & retail trade industry

Shaw Report

|

June 29, 2022

The Shaw Report - Automotive, Transport & Logistics Interim Review May 2022

Shaw Report

|

May 19, 2022

Shaw & Co Launches Annual Analysis of Property and Construction Industry

Shaw Report

|

May 6, 2022

The Shaw Report - TMT Interim Review May 2022

Shaw Report

|

May 5, 2022

The Shaw Report - Manufacturing & Engineering Interim Review April 2022

Shaw Report

|

April 8, 2022

The Shaw Report - Food & Drink Interim Review March 2022

Shaw Report

|

March 25, 2022

The Shaw Report - Professional Services Annual Review 2022

Shaw Report

|

March 17, 2022

The Shaw Report - Leisure, Tourism & Sport December 2021

Shaw Report

|

December 14, 2021

The Shaw Report - Health & Life Sciences December 2021

Shaw Report

|

December 10, 2021

The Shaw Report - Banking, Financial & Insurance Services December 2021

Shaw Report

|

December 8, 2021

The Shaw Report - Energy & Natural Resources November 2021

Shaw Report

|

November 16, 2021

The Shaw Report - Technology, Media & Telecoms October 2021

Shaw Report

|

October 28, 2021

The Shaw Report - Automotive, Transport & Logistics October 2021

Shaw Report

|

October 14, 2021

The Shaw Report - Manufacturing & Engineering October 2021

Shaw Report

|

October 1, 2021

The Shaw Report - Food & Drink September 2021

Shaw Report

|

September 27, 2021